Ok, let me spell it out for you:



If the fact that most clubs would rather sign Yeaman over Whiting is proof of how good he is, than surely the same applies the other way around. Even though you reckon Berrigan has been 'rubbish'.







You see, this is why you should read things more closely. I'm not, nor have I ever been, trying to convince you that Whiting is a better centre than Yeaman. I have said that they both offer different strengths and that Whiting is in better form [iat the moment.[/i I also said on balance that an in form Yeaman would be picked ahead of Whiting.















If you don't like using them, why bother? They tell us next to nowt and I much prefer to watch a game and exercise my own judgement than rely on a bunch of numbers.









This whole paragraph seems somewhat redundant. May I remind you of this:

If the last paragraph was redundant why do you respond to the rest of the post. The point was you said Whiting had been better than Yeaman this season and 100% better than Horne, neither of which are true imo.



Anyway moving on, I believe Whiting has been more flexible/realistic with his contract demands so is hopefully likely to get another deal, hope so.

Because I wasn't the one who said that it wasn't worth continuing the discussion, but then decided to continue it anyway.







At least you've managed to get through your head what I was actually saying now. That's a good start.

Check my first post in response to your question.







So I managed to [iget[/i your point from the start, nothing needed to get through.

Then why say:







...when it's patently obvious that I wasn't trying to do anything of the sort?

Due to the fact that the discussion had moved on and became a more general discussion about the two players, or so I thought.

I see. Because I thought that I had put:







And in the very next post you replied:







Whichever way you look at it, however 'general' you thought the discussion had become, at no point did I try to convince you of anything of the sort.

Based on this season's form you said that Whiting had been better than Yeaman, which I disagreed with in my very first reply to you, as I have already indicated. You said an in form Yeaman would be better than Whiting but he had been out of form for 2/3 years, regardless of which I maintained Yeaman was still better even when out of form.



There is really nothing more to say, you think Whiting has been better and I don't.

Get a room you two

I agree. You just need to accept that I'm right and we can all move on.

Are you my wife?

"Hello Dave"