We had Green, Bowden, Kent, Cunningham, Crooks, Lynne, Briscoe (out on dual reg) Pearce (left) missing for one reason or another. Meaning our less established players were playing, and as such, it was men against boys.

Bowden and Cunningham played

The team-sheet wasn't entirely accurate - James Green was Rovers number 10.



Agree, he was the best player on the pitch. Fantastic prospect.



Rovers' bigger, stronger and faster across the board.



On paper, Rovers were always going to win well against younger opponents (Radford aside) with Peterson, Sherriff, Ollett and Heil all looking a cut above their Hull FC counterparts.

As above Hull had a much young and less experienced team.



Bad day at the office, certainly nothing to panic about.



I just hope tomorrow doesn't go the same way.

Oh yeah!

you knew which Cunningham I meant.





But add Nicklas & Ellis.

Most of the team was u-18s being brought in to cover for players either injured or getting 1st team oppurtunitys....Todays result shows you the legacy of the previous boards total lack of backing the reserves and academys.was told that half the rovers team are Hull fans but the dwarf offerd the money and they have cheques bouncing all over the place and the rovers fans where cracking one off into socks all over the place.Like to know who it was with the rovers staff on the balconey who said "you west Hull B'stards"

Cheques bouncing as in not being paid? Hull or rovers?

Rovers.......was having a chat 2 rows down from me in the seats.

We'll sign all the ones we want from now on.

Yup.

Plenty of Hull supporting youngsters still choosing them over us apparently according to some rovers fans

Would have thought that would have been round the town like wildfire by now if true