Reckon that puts to bed the theory that this is just a smokescreen exercise.

It was only the [isleepwalkers[/i who were suggesting otherwise Kosh.

He plays for Hull FC you know!

I forgot! Bugger!

What are you talking about - "smokescreen exercise"? Who mentioned one of those?



I said it was a counter-attack. I.e. Hull are alluding pointedly to Long's (genuine) concussion and are emphasising the fact that it was caused seconds before his strike by an unpunished head-high blow. I presume that they are doing this to force the committee to look at the severity of the previous incident and thereby give Long a case for mitigating circumstances. Those being a) the concussion affecting his judgement when he went into the tackle and b) the injustice and inconsistency once again of the idiot Child.



A logical strategy and a just one imo. But please, don't let that stop you jumping pompously down people's throats any more. It's hardly your inaugural attempt, is it?

[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/hull/9446715.stmHe's not having the hearing until Thursday now[/url



Illness????

Head injury induced.

Concussion. See previous page, but be careful how you comment on it

Calm down - it wasn't aimed at you. Not sure why you'd think it was TBH.





Take a look through the various threads and you'll see some of the usual suspects using that exact phrase.

worth a try to rationalise his actions i guess.

Or possibly the truth.



I consider myself pretty cynical but at times the level on here beggars belief.