No, the touch judge signalled a drop out. He's waving the flag that way to signal that's dead, and pointing to where it should be restarted (the sticks).

I have no idea how he's come to that conclusion. He was the worst positioned of the three officials and if you're not sure you keep quiet. More than once he gave Ganson the wrong call and more than once was overruled.



Their may have been a knock in in play, you cant tell on the replay who hits it first, but I reckon had the VR been there it'd have been benefit of the doubt attacking team anyway.



Like you say though, Smith didn't seem concerned about all the calls that Wire got, so he's a massively sore loser.

Their's a great picture in the mail that shows Tom touching down and Ganson's position, the touch judge is on the other side and out of shot which to me vindicates Ganson over ruling him.

I still say his signal was Tom bounced the ball down and he calls for a tap 20, but hey I'll not argue the point with ya.

both T/J's were garbage, they looked like they'd be out of place packing veg.

Not sure if anyone has questioned why Waterhouse chose to pass when falling over to score was easier?

More like Warrington arrogance,they wanted to walk it in all the time when straight outright rugby would have won it.On another note,what a signing he is,he was superb.

Discussed in depth on the Warrington forum and the conclusion was that it was Gansons fault.

It took 16 pages to finally get the 'A' word, we must be slipping.

A draw was fine for me thought we was poor today and didn't deserve the win. Hull away is the third hardest away game for me and with it being round 1 and both teams being rusty still ill take the point. Shame we had Westwood kicking at the end or could have escaped with 2points.

And I'll say the same as I always have on this point:



Who is going to pay for the 30 or so extra cameramen, equipment and viewing/editing suite that will be required at the five non-televised games?

You could have a more primitive version, it wouldnt necessarily have to be the same as what sky gets. Just the one camera that is used anyway plus one in each corner would be better than nothing. Of course people would still moan, but as you say, with the lack of money that is already in the game not many clubs will be willing to stump up for a proper system.

Yes like I said just questioning it. Too early to say either way but it needs an eye keeping on it.

We definately looked a better side without having to reply on the dream team on the bench of Radford and Dowes , the bench looked wicked today and we never lost the intenseity