All this clamour for Shaul is a bit silly for me. He played very well against Wakey and then again against a lower ranked team. However McDonnell until his injury was excellent and one of our better players this season.



Shaul should be learning as much as he can and make the spot his own when Shannon's contract is up.

Neither do i! Some still stuck on that he used to play for kr!

Where a few people drinking yesterday, first Horne and now this?



Mcdonnell has been very good for us, even a Rovers fan has said so.



For me he is the best all around FB we have had since Prescott (although I really rated Mckinnon) The only issue I have with him is the niggle injuries he seems to pick up.



Shaul looks a good prosepct, but as Paul M says, he has only played two games and has yet to play against a top side.

McDonnell has been very good so far this season and derseves his spot. Shaul looks a fine prospect but is not ready to be a first choice full back yet. We sould be pleased that we have a good back up player there at last, though.

The number of people at the stadium on Friday moaning that Shaul had been dropped for McDonnell was ridiculous. Yes - he's a very good prospect (who we need to get tied up) but he's way off the finished article.

Mcdonnel had an outstanding start and is my number 2 in best performers so far. Shaul will struggle to get a look in this season unless McD is injured or deemed to require a rest.



Shaul is an exciting prospect who had a great SL debut against Wakey, I hope we can hold on to him, but unless the RL change the rules next season then this ridiculous position of not being able to give him any game time could see him leave, especially if true that another SL team are interested in him.



Best option I can see is get him on a contract to include next year on a season long loan to a Championship club (with recall clause), but whether that is doable or would suit Shaul is unknown.

Do sum on here go to matches ? mcdonnell been one of our best players and signings,shaul hopefully will sign up with us and could be a very good player,but atm no contest,

I’m astounded that this is has become an issue for some. We have a very good/solid full back in McDonnell and what appears to a cracking prospect in Shaul (based upon his brief flirtation with 1st team rugby so far). What on earth is there to be concerned about? (other than getting a contract for Shaul sorted). For me McDonnell has done nothing to merit being replaced as the current No1, however should he lose form or be injured then we have a superb back up, it’s the ideal situation in terms of positional strength.

Shaul is lerkle, McDonnell is not lerkle & used to play for rervers.



Thats the OP's problem innit.

This.

Agreed. Looks a great talent, but Shannon for me. For now.