I disagree,Wigan deserved nothing from the game.Saints were by far the more skillfull and moved the ball quicker.

i disagree. I think a draw would have been a fair result all round.



Doesn't matter what i think though, we lost, so we need to be more clinical.

Rubbish.

One of the most one eyed posts ever.



A draw would have been fair reflection.

Agreed a draw would be a fair result IMHO

Nah. The actual result was in fact the fair result.

Disagree, two mistakes (or a lucky bounce if you prefer) for the first two tries.



The one clinical piece of play was by Eastmond.



Wigan never completed any chance they created whereas Saints did.



For this alone Saints deserved two points.



Fantastic efforts by both team in defence I thought.

By replacing 2 letters with one, as so ...



The one cynical piece of play was by Eastmond



... and you're bang on.



Using one hand to crawl over the line after your momentum has been halted is still a double-movement, even if the ball-carrying arm hasn't left the deck.

You usually talk sense mate, but deep down you know this is rubbish!

At the stadium, I thought the try was fine. But others have drawn my attention to it since, and watching it in slow motion - well, put it this way, it isn't cut and dry.

Yes it was. It would have been a double movement if the ground had been dry. In fact, he would have been stopped well short of the tryline. However, the ground was wet so he was sliding. His momentum [iwas not stopped[/i. It was one continuous movement and therefore the fact that he pushed himself along, which he so clearly did, was irrelevant. He simply kept the movement going until it ended.



The try was opportunistic, as was yours when Meli displayed his fine defensive move (not!).

When did his momentum stop?



If he can drag himself 5 yards with one arm, with a prop lying on top of him then he should be in the Mr Universe competition, never mind SL.