Your statement is incorrect,as you were stating a figure that includes the opposition FACT..If you would care to support your opinion by adding how many of the Leigh referrals there were and actually carried a charge, I would agree with your opinion (NOT)..But you are going all round the houses to make a point thats not there.FACT.

No, the statement was factually correct. The point I was making, was that we (along with Halifax, Wakefield and Featherstone) were involved in three games where there were 34 referrals to the Disciplinary. As explained, I was not making the statement that there were 34 Leigh players.



To me, the Wakefield game didn't seem that bad, as I've stated. I didn't see the Featherstone game, so can't comment on that, but, in my opinion, (and that of several others sitting near me) the Halifax game was a disgrace, irrespective of who started what.



Seventeen Leigh players were referred from those three matches, with three suspended - Armstrong, Acton and Haggerty, all from the Halifax game. Hock could become a fourth suspension, from the Featherstone game, if proven guilty.

Edit for accuracy. That clears it up. FACT.

Thanks for your assistance, reffy!





Let me be one of the first to state that our discipline was fine today.

Is that a fact?

Alan I thought Hock played well and kept his cool ,his fiercest critic on here Wolrab was even praising him during the game

,Jamie Acton still persists in tapping the opposition on the head ,I wish he would stop it.

No - just an opinion!

That's OK then.

Strong ref, put Haven on a team warning early and within a minute sent one to the bin. No issues at all after that. Well done Jamie Bloem.

Even so, I was very wary of expressing that opinion, just in case it was perceived as being remotely negative, in any shape or form.

Being an ex-player is an advantage.

Yes hock did play well today, long may it continue.