so 10 years worth of wasted money on wakey is what then?



lets not get into a competetion on education, thats just childish



ill judge a persons intelligence by the quality of their posts, and tailor my replies accordingly.

The RFL don't "waste" money on Wakey. Wakey allows them the rights to sell their televised games to Sky and the RFL gives them their share of this.







However, I've had my knowledge of economics evaluated by those with Master's degrees and they found it to be worth awarding a degree so I won't lose too much sleep if someone who has never studied it thinks it "simplistic".

wow, i guess youd like me to evaluate your ecos knowledge as well then?



im sure Sky wont be fussed whether its wakey, widnes or another as the TV viewers added by that one club is minimal anyway

How would you be remotely qualified to do so?







Possibly but at least Wakey and Widnes will still be around in 5 years time so the Sky money will gone somewhere productive. With Crusaders in, the RFL might as well just shove tenners into an envelope and post them to random Queensland cup players.

how would i be qualified - read your original post silly.



whats the big deal about masters degrees anyway.



<yawn>



i cant be bothered picking all the faults in your 2nd bit. many clubs have wasted the RFLs money. the RFL has spent very little on trying to grow RL in wales.



job well done

Think you got the wrong thread.

I fail to see any post where I said "Random Aussies are able to critique economic theory".







You won't know until you have one.







Where do you think "the RFL's money" comes from?



I'll give you a clue:



It comes from the clubs that you accuse the RFL of wasting it on.







Indeed we can look forward to Crusaders going bankrupt either this year or next. Huzzah!

look if you want to brag about having minor uni degrees to make up for unintelligent posts, good luck to you.



your posts tell me all i need to know about your level of intelligence.

It's not a case of bragging so much as pointing out that you would have to be particularly clueless to say that an economics graduate has a "simplistic" view of licencing.



If it seems so, it is because I'm talking down to your level.



Naturally I could talk about cost benefit analysis and opportunity cost but since you struggle to keep up at the best of time, what would be the point?







Indeed but I shan't rub in it. It is not your fault.

look ill just ignore you for a bit as its not even worth replying.



best of luck

the reason why im ignoring him is that the MB of laughing at him is less than the MC of typing it out



the law of diminishing marginal return certainly applies here



the opportunity cost of reading his posts is that i could be spending my time reading something intelligent

Can you ignore me as well please ?