Quote Bullseye="Bullseye"How do you define that?
I think Bradford's got big problems but we need to be careful about bandying terms like that around.'"
Bit like a "failed school", I'd suggest. Come on...it just is not working as it is, is it? Inward investment looks to have all but dried up, as the report says the city centre is increasingly abandoned by those with alternatives, the only developments of note outside of the university etc seem to be...near the strategic road network. And Bradford is increasingly seen as a place to get round or through on the way to getting somewhere else.
Its a bloody travesty, given that when I first got my entry visa for Yorkshire in 1977 I lived in Leeds but its centre was a depressing place and I went to the vibrant Bradford for shopping and the like. As I'm sure you'd agree? Then someone gave Leeds "Development Area" status but not Bradford, and a few other gradual but ultimately fundamental changes took place, and look what happened? And the biggest joke of all was that the party that awarded Leeds DA status thought to obtain electoral advantage in Leeds by so doing, when instead all the credit in the minds of the public accrued to the their political opponents who controlled the council. Dumb and dumber...
And the solution? Surely the same as for the "failed school" analogy and also for the Leeds precedent...parachute in a new management and a shedload of central funding to incentivise inward investment and restore some sense of hope (if not yet pride) in the people of the district?
But, and mindful of what happened to the Tories in Leeds, how likely is that while the local authority remains controlled by the opponents of the governing party nationally?