Our missing players asre better than your misisng players though. History says so.

I was responding to the previous post. Read that and then it will make sense for you.

I wasn't talking about asres though.

No. Leeds were coasting at 16-6 and the reefing turned the tide with two quick tries. That wouldnt have happened, in fact Leeds would have more than likely gone in at 22-6.



Anyhow, it's by the by.

Well it would if i was replying to you rather than TheOtherOne but I wasnt was I?

Its all ifs and buts.



We won. End of.

All that matters ATEOTD.

Yup, now to look forward to KR away and build on the positives of last nigh (If you can look forward to going to such a place)

Rubbish. There wasn't a player on that pitch that even came close to Pryce. Had he not gone off, we lost simple as that.



That lad was immense, and every time he had the ball in his hands the leeds defence just fell open.

Make your mind up. You said it was McClennan who let them back into it by taking Buderus off.

Again that's just your opinion, you really shouldn't post as though your word is final mate



Having watched the game again Pryce had some decent moments but was no where near the standard of Roby and Buderus imo.

Whenever Pryce had good situations it came off the back of work done by Roby and once or twice moore around the ruck and Buderus was doing the same for us to allow Sinfield and co cause the problems we did.

Of course.



Would you go anywhere near Glasser???