An improvement on last weeks pathetic 2nd half v the Pies but still with much more improvement still needed.

Galloway had his best game yet ,Falloon made a big difference imo and Handley was quality.

Re-Tries conceded imo for 2 Abblet over-reads the runners when the very basic defensive Coaches will say the threat is ALWAYS THE BALL of course that's not to say Abbos inside man couldn't have at least closed that gap somewhat but that's where we were exploited and no FB can compensate for that with "calling the numbers correctly".

However it was a first game back for him and a few others so it's not like there weren't going to be some errors with and without the ball in such a big game with the pressure mounting.

Hopefully we can build on it now get a more settled 9 ,6 & 7 with other players in their natural positions and move up the table.

In terms of individuals when everyone is fit for me Hall drops out if he isn't already missing through injury!

That kick for Handley's try. Been missing a bit of that cutting edge so far.

Its the full back who numbers up the defence, but on at least one of the occasions we were short because a tackler didn't get back in to line quick enough. Really there the credit, rather than blame, has to go to Saints for getting a quick play the ball, in a perfect area of the pitch, and exploiting it well.

Falloon was good with ball in hand but was at fault for Saints first two tries .

He's at fault for the Walsh one, because he got his angles wrong and allowed Walsh to get outside him.



The other one (LMS?) was an over-read from Ablett outside him that left a massive gap.

Did I read the stats right at 43 missed tackles by Leeds and 39 for Sts? That's utter garbage from both sides.

Whilst I completely agree on the face of it, does anyone know what constitutes a "missed tackle" in these stats?



For instance, if a half back gets the ball & then skips across the line of defense laterally (looking for a gap/runner), he often evades about 5 or 6 defenders (they may even get their fingertips to him) - would this count as 5 or 6 missed tackles?



I cannot believe that there were 82 genuine missed tackles as I would define them in that match.

It's unlikely anybody knows what constitutes an Opta missed tackle as no-one can be d relating the numbers to the actual instances in the game.



Did I hear that the Roosters missed 49 tackles last week. Trent Robinson's stock may have peeked.

That's SL for you

If it has I would still have him at Leeds - quality coach, you cannot get rid of all your best players and expect to perform at the same level - a tough year ahead for Trent

I would have thought OPTA work on criteria provided by SL or the RFL. In any case I would expect that for a tackle to become a missed tackle the defender has at least to get hands on the attacker and then drop off. This will occur more often with the hard working defenders that put in high tackle counts in field where sometimes your own teammates can know you off in a multi player tackle. Where it is less excusable in when a player makes the ratio of 6 tackles with 5 misses.



Where I am unsure of how a missed tackle is recorded in when a player hopefully dives and completely misses with no contact.

Missed tackles are, a lot of the time, no big deal in the grand scheme of things providing a team mate compensates. Despite Leeds (presumably) missing a bundle in the 2nd half saints failed to score.