You really are fooking duma$$ arnt you?



You just said it right there....."We obviously give a ****" WE meaning Huddersfield Giants. Whereas at the min your telling Leeds Rhinos fans - fans that couldnt give a to$$ whether he gets a ban.



And whats with the "

" after every post?

I would have to agree with flyingprop on this one Ali does swing at him from the floor and to be fair to Raleigh he stands and waits for him to get up before having a wild swing.

If you & Flying Prop consider that Ali's actions are equal to what Raleigh did then I despair.

[urlhttp://giantsrl.dnsupdate.co.uk/latestNews/NewsArticle.asp?Index=3362[/url

2 weeks wages is a bit unfair.

Yes I'm sure there are plenty of spectators queing up to give Lauitiiti a dig.

Sorry mate but nowhere have I condoned what Andy did nor have I said it's equal whatsoever, what I did say numerous times and was told I was talking rubbish was that Ali swung 1st, that's all, seems after reviewing the incident the RFL tend to agree.



Gone quiet on this issue now on here?

Despair all you want but learn to read first.

I already have over the way we played.

I hope Friday's effort's are better.

It's not for want of effort, though, it's a general lack of nous - particularly near the line.

I watched the incident last night on Boots n all the tries and I am not sure Ali swung a punch at Raleigh! I think Ali tried to push Raleigh off him rather than punch, as I don't think Ali liked being held by Raleigh when he did not have the ball. However, Raleigh stands and then Ali clearly gives him some verbal while getting up, then Raleigh swings at him (and misses), but it was a clear and deliberate effort to punch Ali (albeit clearly provoked).



I think the Ref got the call spot on by binning them both and also giving Leeds the penalty and I also think that Raleigh was the only one of the two guilty of actual intended foul play warranting a disciplinary appearance and that is why he was summoned to appear. I think that, given Ali had clearly given him some verbal, a fine and not a ban was a good call by the RFL.



I think anyone who can not see that this would be a fair reflection of the incident needs to take their respective tinted specs off!

I think Andy Raleigh having received a 'written warning on record' a mere five weeks ago from the same disciplinary panel can indeed count himself fortunate to have escaped a playing ban for a second =#FF0000Guilty verdict of the season. www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1555

I think Andy Raleigh having received a 'written warning on record' a mere five weeks ago from the same disciplinary panel can indeed count himself fortunate to have escaped a playing ban for a second =#FF0000Guilty verdict of the season. www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1555

Got to love the "lucky dip" disciplinary panel eh?





Thats almost as good as banning players for games that mysteriously co-incide with important playoff / league / cup games.