What did you think of Charnley Friday?

Speaking of the ref today, what was our sin-binning for? Was it for repeat offending?

[iThey said on the radio[/i it was for dissent, but maybe it was for persistent fouling, which in itself would be just as bad.

I've no idea what you are alluding to here. All my comments on the game today were based upon listening to the radio commentary and nothing more. The context was clear and unambiguous all along.



Next week, I shall be passing comments after the game against Wigan on the basis of my attendance. Once again, the context is clear and unambiguous.

Burgess had been on the pitch a matter of seconds before he was back on the bench - if it was for persistent offending then Burgess was real unlucky to cop for it.

Sinbinnings are the hottest thing out of the RFL this weekend. Everybody who is anybody (oh, and Bradford) is getting at least one. We had two! See how many you can collect next weekend. You won't have a bleeding clue what they were for (even after watching the highlights of your game on The Superleague Show) but they do enhance the excitement.

His performance was disappointingly poor, much like the rest of the Wigan players on the night.



Nonetheless, my knee remained static throughout.

[url=http://loverugbyleague.com/news_5264-rhinos-second-half-stampede-too-much-for-wildcats.htmlA match report here.[/url

Keith, just so I'm clear, will the threads you post on next week only be open to people who have attended the game, rather than watched it on TV or listened on the radio?



Just want to understand the ground rules.

Did Mr and Mrs Dean really not realise that calling their son Chris would result in him having a girls name?

I expected a possessed 50's Hot Rod to come on and get the prize.

Subtle.